Cherry Kim vs Mutsumi Uemura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 05 Jun at 01:32 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
C. Kim vs M. Uemura

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kim 1 - 0 Uemura
They have played 3 sets in total, with Cherry Kim winning 2 and Mutsumi Uemura winning 1. The last match between Cherry Kim and Mutsumi Uemura was at the W15 Osaka, 05-06-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Cherry Kim getting the victory 6-4 2-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kim | 1 |
| Uemura | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W15 Osaka(06-05-25)
C. Kim vs M. Uemura H2H Profile
C. Kim vs M. Uemura Match Preview:
- In recent months, Kim has secured 34.86% of points on their second serve. How does Uemura compare? Uemura leads slightly with 38.12% success.
- Kim's return game shows a strong performance, winning 54.81% of points on their opponent's second serve compared to Uemura's 51.98%.
- Analyzing first serve return points, Kim is ahead with 36.78%, while Uemura stands at 34.1%.
- Under pressure, Kim has saved 49.07% of breakpoints, compared to Uemura who saved 46.84%.
- Over the past year, Kim has a superior overall win rate at 60%, while Uemura's win percentage is 46.15%.
- On indoor hard courts, Kim has an exceptional win rate of 75%. Does Uemura match this on clay? Not quite; Uemura has a 50% win rate.
- Kim has played most events at the $10K level, achieving a 63.41% win rate, compared to Uemura's 54.55% at the same tournament level.
- Regarding opponent rankings, Kim has faced players averaging a rank of 331.4, whereas Uemura's opponents averaged a rank of 311.54.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Uemura has a higher success rate, winning 60% of those matches, while Kim has won 53%.
- Kim demonstrates higher efficiency in converting breakpoints, with a conversion rate of 43.94% compared to Uemura's 37.7%.
Editorial Prediction (June 5, 2025, UTC):
As we look forward to this upcoming tennis match, recent performance patterns give insight into each player's strengths and potential weaknesses. Kim shows a robust return game and pressure-handling ability, which are crucial for gaining the upper hand.
Furthermore, Kim's superior overall match win percentage over the past year suggests greater consistency in performance. Their proficiency on indoor hard courts, with a 75% win rate, highlights a notable edge given the playing surface.
Though Uemura has a slight advantage in deciding sets and previously faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, Kim's return statistics and breakpoint conversion rate are influential. These factors, alongside Kim's recent form and ability to handle high-pressure scenarios, indicate they are more likely to close out the match successfully.
Based on these factual comparisons, Kim is the probable winner for this upcoming tennis match.
Cherry Kim vs Mutsumi Uemura Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
C. Kim vs M. Uemura H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 14 | Games Won | 13 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 2:46:21 | Average Match Time | 2:46:21 |
| 67% (62/92) | 1st Serve % | 60% (52/87) |
| 56% (35/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (32/52) |
| 37% (11/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (10/35) |
| 41% (7/17) | Break Pts Won % | 55% (6/11) |
| 52% (45/87) | Return Points Win % | 50% (46/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
C. Kim Recent Matches Played
M. Uemura Recent Matches Played

C. Kim vs M. Uemura Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.33% (83/67) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.67% (14/16) |
| 54.13% (177/150) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.14% (33/37) |
| 51.41% (1512/1429) | Games Win/Loss | 50.61% (334/326) |
| 53.85% (70/60) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.62% (10/11) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 71.43% (10/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 58 | Aces Total | 16 |
| 0.32 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 452 | Total Double Faults | 83 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:10:37 |
| 351.94 | Average Opponent Rank | 304.97 |
| 63% (3512/5573) | 1st Serve % | 63% (793/1250) |
| 57% (2003/3512) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (465/793) |
| 38% (781/2061) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (174/457) |
| 50% (379/756) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (73/149) |
| 48% (2722/5710) | Return Points Win % | 46% (586/1269) |
| 53.49% (23/20) | Challenger W/L | 28.57% (2/5) |
| 56.07% (60/47) | Futures W/L | 52.17% (12/11) |
| 55% (81/147) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 73% (11/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (3/6) |
| 55% (17/31) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (5/10) |
| 91% (81/74) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (13/11) |
| 9% (81/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (13/2) |
| 12% (68/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (17/3) |